deceptive intent claim

• CURIE: gmeow:deceptiveIntentClaim
• IRI: https://blackcatinformatics.ca/gmeow/deceptiveIntentClaim
• Category: property
• Defined by: gmeow:slices/deception

An attributed, defeasible standpoint claim that the event was carried out with deceptive intent. The vantage is the assessor (who attributes the intent), not the deceiver; the claim carries gmeow:confidence and gmeow:wasAttributedTo. Intent is NEVER entailed by the reasoner — it is a contestable attribution that coexists with its denial (Principle 9).

Structure

Property shape: object property; gmeow:Event -> gmeow:StandpointClaim

Practical Pattern

Use gmeow:deceptiveIntentClaim from gmeow:Event to gmeow:StandpointClaim when the relationship itself belongs in the native GMEOW graph.

Common Companion Terms

gmeow:Event, gmeow:StandpointClaim

External Equivalences

Equivalent or closely aligned targets: crminf

Linkages

Generated from the canonical mapping DSL. SSSOM files are the generated public interchange form for term equivalences.

Term Equivalences

Usage Advice

Use when

• Use to attach an assessor's attribution that an event was deliberately deceptive — keeping intent OUT of the logic, as a confidence-weighted, attributed claim rather than an entailed fact (the lie/error/bullshit distinction turns on intent the reasoner must not decide).

Avoid when

• Avoid asserting intent as a global fact or boolean flag, and avoid putting the deceiver in the vantage — the vantage is the ASSESSOR; never let the reasoner entail deceptiveness (it is contestable and coexists with its denial, Principle 9).

How to use

• Mint a gmeow:StandpointClaim whose gmeow:vantage is the assessor, carry gmeow:confidence and gmeow:wasAttributedTo, and link it via gmeow:deceptiveIntentClaim; record a denial as a separate coexisting claim rather than negating this one.

Examples

• ex:event gmeow:deceptiveIntentClaim ex:intentAssessment.